Bidder Inquiries
Caltrans Bidding Connect Account:
Sign In (Sign in is required to access Project Plans)
Create Account (Click here to create a Caltrans Bidding Connect Account)
Viewing inquiries for 12-0K93U4
Submit new inquiry for this projectInquiry #1: Concrete Barrier Transitions are not called out on plans. Please include callouts for the transitions.
Inquiry submitted 05/15/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 05/15/2025
Inquiry #2: Please provide As-Built drawings for the existing retaining walls at the locations identified for removal per the plans in order for the Contractor to accurately assess the existing conditions prior to demolition.
Inquiry submitted 05/16/2025
Response #1:As-built requests are to be submitted per section 2-1.06B of the standard specifications.
Response posted 05/16/2025
Response #2:As-built requests are to be submitted per section 2-1.06B of the standard specifications.
Response posted 05/16/2025
Inquiry #3: Please provide As-Built drawings for the existing La Palma Ave OC Bridge and the exsiting Miraloma Ave OC Bridge in order for the Contractor to accurately assess the existing conditions prior to demolition.
Inquiry submitted 05/16/2025
Response #1:As-built requests are to be submitted per section 2-1.06B of the standard specifications.
Response posted 05/16/2025
Inquiry #4: Due to this project bidding one day before a national holiday, we respectfully request for this project to bid one week later (July 10th) so that primes, subs, and DBEs can enjoy this traditionally week-long mid-year break.
Inquiry submitted 05/20/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 05/21/2025
Inquiry #5: Please correct the Department's dead link in the Special Provisions for Notices of Suspension and Proposed Debarment from the Federal Highway Administration.
Inquiry submitted 05/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/03/2025
Inquiry #6: Please provide the work codes that were used to establish the 22% GFE goal.
Inquiry submitted 05/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/03/2025
Inquiry #7: Please review all concrete barrier quantities. Callouts on plans do not match what is shown on the summary of quantities. Please advise.
Inquiry submitted 05/23/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 05/27/2025
Inquiry #8: Isolation Joint (Silicone) quantities are not clear from what is shown on the plans & the summary sheet. Please advise.
Inquiry submitted 05/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. The contractor can refer to typical cross sections for areas labeled IJ for all of these locations.
Response posted 05/27/2025
Inquiry #9: Reference Sheet WPCQ-1 (Temporary Cover). There is currently unaccounted qty for this item on sheet WPC-2. Please adjust quantity to reflect what is shown in the plans.
Inquiry submitted 05/23/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 05/27/2025
Inquiry #10: Can isolations casings be supplied in whole rounds (92" or 96") instead of 2 halves?
Inquiry submitted 05/28/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/02/2025
Inquiry #11: The bid list includes both armor-clad and non–armor-clad wire; however, the plans do not indicate the specific locations for the armor-clad wiring. While non–armor-clad wire is permitted in conduit, confirmation of the intended installation locations for each wire type is requested.
Inquiry submitted 06/03/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/03/2025
Inquiry #12: Reference Sheet SCQ-3 (Temporary Crash Cushion TL-3). The value quantified on the table does not match the bid item quantity; Please advise whether the bid item quanitity will be revised.
Inquiry submitted 06/03/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. On sheet SQ-3 this item has an asterisk symbol and the note for this asterisk directs you to see sheet SQ-11 for the total amount.
Response posted 06/04/2025
Inquiry #13: Reference Sheet 814 of 979. Please advise where the quantity of joint seal replacement (Section D-D) is to be under. The total joint seal quantity shown on Sheet 809 of 979 appears to only cover the new joint seal length within the bridge widening.
Inquiry submitted 06/03/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/05/2025
Inquiry #14: Reference Sheet 465 of 979. Please verify the pay quantity for Bid Item 336, Install sign panel on existing frame. The overhead sign quantities do not match the quantity shown on the Bid Item List.
Inquiry submitted 06/03/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/04/2025
Inquiry #15: Please review all concrete surface texture quantities. The overall pay quantity shown on the bid list does not equate to the sum of the individual quantity sheets. Please advise
Inquiry submitted 06/03/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/05/2025
Inquiry #16: Due to multiple projects bidding at or near this bid date, we respectfully request a postponement of two weeks so that we can prepare a competitive bid.
Inquiry submitted 06/09/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued. Bid date will be determined by Caltrans/OCTA.
Response posted 06/13/2025
Inquiry #17: Please consider pushing back the bid date to allow for more time to complete the DBE Good Faith Effort Submittal. Due to the holiday and time needed to mail out the GFE package the 5 day timeline leaves contractors 1 day to complete the GFE submittal. Additionally, it will be difficult to obtain signatures for the DBE Confirmations due to the holiday immediately following the bid due date.
Inquiry submitted 06/09/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/13/2025
Inquiry #18: Reference Bid Item 11: Automated Work Zone Information System (1LS). Can a plan sheet which shows the approximate # of PCMS Boards, cameras, sensors, etc be provided in order to get more accurate pricing for this item since it is LS? Please advise.
Inquiry submitted 06/10/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/12/2025
Inquiry #19: Plan Sheets E-96 and E-97; both require 334LS Census Cabinets. The plans and specifications do not call for an Input File and there are Detector Loops showing on the plans for these locations. There is no Electrical Detail Sheet for the Census Cabinets (CCTV Only). Is an Input File required for the 334LS Census Cabinets?
Inquiry submitted 06/10/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued to update callout(s) and provide a detail. No input files are required.
Response posted 06/12/2025
Response #2:Addendum will be issued to update callout(s) and provide a detail. No input files are required.
Response posted 06/12/2025
Inquiry #20: Referencing Sheet IP-3 and IP-4, there is mainline drawn on IP-3 that does not continue onto IP-4. Please show on the plans the continuation of the mainline.
Inquiry submitted 06/10/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. The mainline ends at the valve manifold on Sheet IP-3 & does not continue to Sheet IP-4.
Response posted 06/12/2025
Inquiry #21: Please confirm the plans refer to barrier rail system it means Type 3F. If not, what is the difference between K Rail and Temporary Barrier System?
Inquiry submitted 06/11/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #22: Please provide a traffic chart for work on E91 from Acacia St to E91 to N57 connector.
Inquiry submitted 06/11/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #23: Reference Sheets C-30 through C-32 (EB Direction, STA 307+50 to STA 329+18); There currently isn't a lane closure chart that allows for the lane replacement and mill & overlay work. Will a new lane closure chart be provided to allow for this work to be completed? Please advise.
Inquiry submitted 06/11/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #24: This project includes a DBE participation goal and is currently scheduled to bid on July 3rd. However, July 4th is a national holiday, which significantly impacts the timeline for post-bid documentation. As part of the DBE requirements, DBE paperwork and good faith effort documentation must be submitted no later than the fifth business day following the bid opening. With the holiday falling on a Friday, contractors will have only one business day to prepare and submit their paperwork. Several subcontractors have indicated they will be unavailable due to the holiday and planned time off, which will severely limit DBE participation and hinder the contractor’s ability to complete the required forms. We request that the bid date be postponed to ensure contractors have sufficient time to meet the DBE documentation requirements and encourage more DBE participation.
Inquiry submitted 06/11/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued. Bid date will be determined by Caltrans/OCTA.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #25: Please confirm if all other existing irrigation controllers are on a Two-Wire (2-Wire) system.
Inquiry submitted 06/11/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Contractor to field verify the types of controllers that are impacted prior to start of work.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #26: Reference Plan Sheet X-31. Please provide the intended typical pavement structural section that will be required adjacent to the existing RW. Currently indicates "T" which is an existing section.
Inquiry submitted 06/12/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. T refers to the existing typical section. The portion adjacent to the RW is the barrier slab. Refer to Retaining Wall 446 concrete barrier slab detail for more information.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #27: Can you please provide the geotechnical report for this project?
Inquiry submitted 06/12/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please refer to the Information Handout for the Geotechnical Design Report.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #28: The notice to bidders section of the special provisions mentions a permanent erosion control establishment period. What permanent erosion control work is this covering, and how is this paid?
Inquiry submitted 06/12/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #29: Are encroachment permits no cost, and if not what is their cost?
Inquiry submitted 06/12/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please refer to SSP 5-1.20I for additional details.
Response posted 06/16/2025
Inquiry #30: Section 12-4.02C(3)(e) provides in part "No work is allowed within the highway from June 1, 2028 to September 1, 2028 along the Games Route Network shown in the following tables:" Is it the intent that the project shutdown or no work be performed that interferers with traffic? If the intent is that the project shutdown, will the assessment of working days be suspended?
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. All of the activities within the LA28 Game Route Network will be a shutdown from June 1, 2028 to September 1, 2028.
Response posted 06/17/2025
Inquiry #31: Section 12-4.02C(3)(e) provides in part "No highway closures are allowed from June 1, 2028 to September 1, 2028. Plan all work shown on the stage construction and traffic handling plans to comply with this requirement." Can the 12 month closure of La Palma Ave include the period from June 1, 2028 to September 1, 2028?
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. The contractor is not allowed to work during LA28 within the Game Route Network (From June 1, 2028 to September 1, 2028).
Response posted 06/17/2025
Inquiry #32: Please provide direction regarding our crackfilling suppliers input regarding crackfill placement. To eliminate reflective irregularities in the newly placed asphalt the crackfilling needs to have a cure time at a minimum of 24 hours after its installation prior to placing hot asphalt. Will Caltrans allow 24 hours of curing time in the areas designated for crackfill or accept any irregularities?
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please refer to Section 37-6 of the Standard Specifications.
Response posted 06/18/2025
Inquiry #33: We respectfully request that the agency consider postponing bid opening an additional 2 weeks.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued. Bid date will be determined by Caltrans/OCTA.
Response posted 06/17/2025
Inquiry #34: Please provide the types of concrete barriers to be removed on plan sheets L-12 thru L-18 to understand proper means and methods. Is footings part of the concrete barrier removals?
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Refer to as-builts for more information on type of existing barrier. For more guidance on existing barrier removal, see Section 83 in specifications.
Response posted 06/17/2025
Inquiry #35: Special Provision 46-1.01A limits the amount of wall segment to be constructed at any onetime to 1/5 the wall length. Does the preclude walls 444 and 436 from stability testing in accordance with SS 46-1.01D(2)(a)?
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Section 46-1.01A of the special provisions does not preclude Retaining Wall No. 436 and Retaining Wall No. 444 from stability testing in accordance with section 46-1.01D(2)(a) of the Standard Specifications.
Response posted 06/26/2025
Inquiry #36: Regarding WB91-NB57 Connector Bridge, Seet No 866 “Abutment Details No.4” Wingwall Detail 1 and Wingwall Detail 2 scaled measurements do not match dimensions noted on other sheets. Please confirm correct scales/dimensions for these details.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Refer to item 2 in the list in the 2nd paragraph of section 5-1.02, "Contract Components," of the Standard Specifications.
Response posted 06/26/2025
Inquiry #37: Regarding WB91-NB57 Connector Bridge, extrapolation from multiple sheets can be used to find the defined elevation for top of back wall and top of footing for Abutment 1Left, Abutment 1Right, and Abutment 4Left. Top of footing for Abutment 4Right can also be deduced. However, no details are provided for the top of back wall elevation of Abutment 4Right. Please provide information necessary for all abutment elevations/dimensions.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. For top of back wall elevations for WB91-NB57 Connector, refer to Plan view and Typical section on sheet 856 of 979 of the contract plans and Section A-A on sheet 863 of 979 of the contract plans.
Response posted 06/26/2025
Inquiry #38: At WB91-NB57 Connector Bridge, please provide all missing bent column dimensions.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Refer to Bent Elevation view, Section D-D, and Section E-E on sheet 874 of 979 of the contract plans.
Response posted 06/26/2025
Inquiry #39: Scales for abutment details on sheet 900 conflict with provided dimensions. Please confirm provided dimensions are to be followed.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Refer to item 2 in the list in the 2nd paragraph of section 5-1.02, "Contract Components," of the Standard Specifications.
Response posted 06/26/2025
Inquiry #40: Please provide clarity for Drainage System 5 a,b,c, & d. There is no data on the profile sheets, nor does it show what is intended on sheet D-3, please advise
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. The drainage elements DS 5 a, b, c, & d are adjust manhole frame and cover grade. No profiles were provided for these elements. Please see detail for adjust manhole frame and cover to grade on sheet DD-8.
Response posted 06/18/2025
Inquiry #41: Sheet C-36, calls for pavement section 21 at STA. 362+81 to 363+41 (WB-91), however the hatching for the pavement removal/replacement is shown as section 20. Please confirm the correct pavement section for this stationing.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued to revise section "21" to section "20"
Response posted 06/18/2025
Inquiry #42: Sheet C-30 - C-39 have no scale. This prevents the contractor from comparing pavement rehab work with Staging Drawings. Please provide scaled drawings for comparison.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/17/2025
Inquiry #43: Will the state please extend the bid date, with the amount of work the state has released and the bid date adjacent to the holiday, our disadvantage business partners have expressed that they will not commit to bidding this project. Or will the state reduce the DBE goal?
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued to extend the bid date.
Response posted 06/17/2025
Inquiry #44: On Sheet X-5 at Station 335+50 to 337+40.41 ~76' L of the "AW" line calls out pavement section 15 however the cross section appeared different from other area where Pavement Section 15 is called out. Is a different pavement section meant to be here? Please Advise
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/17/2025
Inquiry #45: The special provisions provide material pricing for the various irrigation items supplied through SiteOne Irrigation; these however do not provide pricing for the required irrigation booster pump (Bid Item #292). Please provide all related hydraulic criteria to be used for bidding the booster pump station or advise if the booster pump will be procured through SiteOne and provide the material price quoted to the Department.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #46: Refer to Note #4 on Irrigation Plan Sheet IP-2, where new 3" GSP and 2" SCC are proposed. Advise where on the bid form this work will be paid for or provide a line item for bidding purposes.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please refer to the following line items:
208008 3” Galvanized Steel Pipe (Supply Line)
208690 PVC Pipe Conduit (Sleeve)
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #47: Refer to Exist (CITY) IRRIGATION/LANDSCAPE TO BE REPAIRED or REPLACED IF DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION on irrigation plan sheets #IP-5 & IP-7 and planting plans #PP-6 & PP-8. For these and any other locations where the contractor is expected to repair or replace, it is difficult to establish a hard cost to something that cannot be quantified. We suggest the Department provide an allowance for all areas identified as such, thereby allowing bids to be balanced and accounting for this unknown in a fair way for all affected parties.
Inquiry submitted 06/13/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #48: Caltrans has answered numerous bidder inquiries that an Addendum will be issued to extend the bid date of the project. Due to the many scopes of work included on this project which includes a vast amount of subcontracts and suppliers, we would like to request the bid extension be issued soon in order to help with both internal and external bid planning.
Inquiry submitted 06/17/2025
Response #1:Please see Addendum No. 2 issued on 6/19.
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #49: Please confirm if the quantity for Item 295 Misc. Metal(Bridge) is correct? The quantity we came up with is short of plan quantity.
Inquiry submitted 06/17/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/30/2025
Inquiry #50: Item 171 mention 16" CIDH for SW whereas standard plan B15-3 case 2 and B15-5 case 2 show 30" CIDH. Please Clarify. Thanks.
Inquiry submitted 06/17/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. For more information refer to standard plan B15-5 Section E-E.
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #51: Please confirm that because there is not a Joint Seal bid item (Item Code 414200, 414201, or 414202) the contraction joints in the JPCP and the JPCP (RSC) will not be widened and sealed on this project. If it is the intent to seal the contraction joints, please add a bid item for this work that will define whether the seal is to be Asphalt Rubber, Silicone, or Preformed Compression as shown on standard plan P20.
Inquiry submitted 06/17/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #52: Sheet 850 of 979 PC/Pretensioned Wide Flange Girder (Harped Strands) at the SR-957 Connector/SR-91 Separation shows a note saying "additional top bar, typ (see table)." However, the table doesn't provide the # of bar, length of bar, and quantity. Please provide this information.
Inquiry submitted 06/18/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 07/01/2025
Inquiry #53: We request complete specifications for the new irrigation booster pump indicated by line item #292. If this is to be furnished by SiteOne, there should be a designated part number used to determine pump size and all other related hydraulics. Provide part number prior to bid please.
Inquiry submitted 06/18/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued. Contractor to acquire Booster Pump Assembly specifications, including part number(s) from the distributor with the provided hydraulic requirements on Sheet IP-7 & submit for approval.
Response posted 06/30/2025
Inquiry #54: The table listed in the Special Provisions provide prices for the irrigation controllers however, the price indicated has expired and was only valid through 9-30-2024. Please advise or provide updated pricing that would remain in effect for this contract.
Inquiry submitted 06/18/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. The prices/quotes provided are good until 10/1/2025.
Response posted 06/26/2025
Inquiry #55: With regard to bid item #51, the plans do not indicate locations or types of reclaimed water signs to be installed. Please provide more information, clear enough to bid from and quantities of reclaimed water signs to be installed.
Inquiry submitted 06/18/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. The project will use potable water, not reclaimed water.
Response posted 06/30/2025
Inquiry #56: Please provide the Engineers Estimate pricing for each bid item used to come up with the total Engineers Estimate of $140,000,000
Inquiry submitted 06/18/2025
Response #1:Bid per advertised contract package.
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #57: Based on the answers to bidder inquiries 16,17,24 and 38 the state is going to push the bid date. What is the new bid date going to be?
Inquiry submitted 06/19/2025
Response #1:Please see Addendum No. 2 issued on 6/19.
Response posted 06/19/2025
Inquiry #58: REFER TO THE "E" SHEETS. THERE ARE SEVERAL "SCHEDULE" TABLES IN WHICH THEY ARE NOT CONSISTENT (OR DISCREPANCIES) WITH ITS NOTATIONS AND CALL OUTS WITHIN THE TABLES COMPARED TO WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY OR WE WILL BID AS INTERPRETED.
Inquiry submitted 06/19/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 06/26/2025
Inquiry #59: The specified irrigation controller f is a 96 station controller, this is in conflict with the bid item description for bid item #96 16-18 Station irrigation Controller (Pedestal Mounted) Please revise the bid form accordingly to reconcile notation and special provisions for the irrigation control units.
Inquiry submitted 06/19/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please refer to Bid Item #97.
Response posted 06/30/2025
Inquiry #60: The irrigation schedule on Sheet ISS-1 requires the installation of a Riser Type IV for Tree Well Sprinkler Assemblies, confirm this is correct or revise the sprinkler schedule.
Inquiry submitted 06/19/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/30/2025
Inquiry #61: There are several existing irrigation controllers that may require new control & neutral conductors. Please advise if these existing systems are conventionally wired or if 2-wire conductors will be required. (reference existing controllers A, D, E & SC)
Inquiry submitted 06/19/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Contractor to field verify the types of control & neutral conductors needed for the existing controllers.
Response posted 06/30/2025
Inquiry #62: DS 25a (h,j,b,d,f) can't be found on Drainage Plan D-7, please review and advise where this drainage System is?.
What is shown on D-7 doesn't match what is on DP-10.
Please advise.
Inquiry submitted 06/20/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 06/30/2025
Inquiry #63: For Bid Items 235 - 18" SLOTTED PLASTIC PIPE & 244 - 12" SLOTTED PLASTIC PIPE respectively, please confirm and or clarify if minor concrete or RSC will be poured all the way to the slotted grate F.S as manufactures recommended or only pour up to subgrade, so that afterwards the paving contractors can install the required structural section?
For most of these slotted pipes the top of pipe will be between subgrade and finish grade, living no space for the slotted portion.
Please advise.
Inquiry submitted 06/20/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please refer to Standard Plans/Specifications.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #64: Will the state please review the imported borrow bid item 66 Qty 31,000 CY, our outside take off source and inside resource is exceeding the stated quantity dramatically.
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please also refer to structure backfill quantity bid items 056 to 064.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #65: Will the state please review the Roadway Excavation bid item 50 Qty 80,000 CY, our outside take off source and inside resource is underrunning the stated quantity dramatically.
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Please also refer to bid items 051 to 055 and 065.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #66: The closure chart for the WB91 State College Off Ramp (Chart No. J3) only allows for a single 55 hour closure. However, there is approx. 1,100 CY of LCB and JPCP RSC to be placed, including the full demo section. Will the state allow for multiple weekend closures to complete the ramp work?
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #67: Sheet SC-28 Shows some sort of Crash Cushion Array being used but does not specify which type is to be used. Please Clarify.
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Crash cushion is specified on sheet SC-28.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #68: Please provide clarity on plan sheet C27 the details shows that the MVP's (8ea) has either HMA or RHMA what asphalt mix will be required? or is it the intent that the state allows the contractor to utilze either when constructing work?.
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is. Refer to layout sheets and typical cross sections.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #69: On Sheet L-7 at the intersection of Blue Gum and La Palma, there is a Structural Section #4 that is shown in front of Curb & Gutter. Please clarify if this is the intent.
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #70: Provide spacing or count of drill and bond dowels in concrete barrier end anchors and transitions.
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #71: Please provide clarity regarding the temporary enbankment is Caltrans removing the temporary enbankment and replacing it at a different stage, can Caltrans provide the staging for temporary enbankment or is this left to be finish design grade?
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #72: Per the contract documents there is 2 DPPIA's that are paid in bid item 65 (Ditch Excavation, 502 CY's) Please provide where the remaining 5 DPPIA are to be paid?
Inquiry submitted 06/23/2025
Response #1:Addendum will be issued.
Response posted 07/02/2025
Inquiry #73: Per Addendum 2, changes were made to the layout plan sheets and c sheets. Can Caltrans cloud the changes as to assure it is not missed by the contractor
Inquiry submitted 06/30/2025
Response #1:Bid as is.
Response posted 07/01/2025
The information provided in the responses to bidder inquiries is not a waiver of Section 2-1.07, "JOB SITE AND DOCUMENT EXAMINATION" of the Standard Specifications or any other provision of the contract, nor to excuse the contractor from full compliance with the contract. Bidders are cautioned that subsequent responses or contract addenda may change a previous response.